I've had a little setback with misrouted: it turns out that my original idea of how the universe of CP objects work (ie we have item and containers) turns out to be deeply wrong.
While parsing some complex rulebase with the old implementation it turns out that the objects are divided in 3 classes: items, containers and container-of-listable-items (ideas on naming are welcome). This is because you can have a network, which is a collection, that can contain a group, also previously a collection, in a different way then that the group contains the network: all members of the group are in the network versus a custom method looking if all possible ip's in the network are in the group. Also the trivial method I used the last method kind of broke down when it tried to expand a /8 network into ip's. :-S
So this means surgery at a pretty deep level in the class hierarchy and the old program could just about handle it, but the scars run deep. So misrouted is being rewritten to use the new setup. The good news it that I've thought of a more complex, but not O((N_rules**4)**N_firewalls**2) method of simulating the effects of a rulebase on traffic.
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Thursday, November 16, 2006
on blobs
I notice that the binary blob discussion is again on lwns front page. Recently I got a new portable from work and this gave me some new insight. In short: binary-only drivers are so bad people will buy other hardware.
The machine (a Lenovo Z61m) uses a X1400 ATI chip, so I have to use the ATI binary-only driver. Well. I'm trying to use it.
The amount of grief I'm getting from it would convince even billg himself that opensource drivers are mandatory in an opensource system. Strange errors pop up and you're just lost, googling only gives you forums where other poor users are trying to make it all work. Due to the dynamic nature of xorg and kernel development the driver will never 'catch up' and problems will keep popping up. And there is little I can do except complain to the responsible person and urge him to buy the Intel only portable next time.
If this keeps on Intel will just sweep the Linux hacker's market, and with it the heart and minds of a lot of people. My next machine will be an Intel, the first one in years, because I cannot get an AMD with a open graphics card, and I think I won't be alone in this.
The machine (a Lenovo Z61m) uses a X1400 ATI chip, so I have to use the ATI binary-only driver. Well. I'm trying to use it.
The amount of grief I'm getting from it would convince even billg himself that opensource drivers are mandatory in an opensource system. Strange errors pop up and you're just lost, googling only gives you forums where other poor users are trying to make it all work. Due to the dynamic nature of xorg and kernel development the driver will never 'catch up' and problems will keep popping up. And there is little I can do except complain to the responsible person and urge him to buy the Intel only portable next time.
If this keeps on Intel will just sweep the Linux hacker's market, and with it the heart and minds of a lot of people. My next machine will be an Intel, the first one in years, because I cannot get an AMD with a open graphics card, and I think I won't be alone in this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
