My Common Lisp and Debian blog. For more off topic rants and stuff please see my livejournal blog.

Thursday, March 03, 2005

Interesting future packages?

While investigating the packages I adopted. I ran across a few interesting unpackaged ones.


But before I package yet another set of Common Lisp libraries I would like to know if there would be users of these packages. If so, speak up.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

yes. specially cl-prevalence and elephant

Anonymous said...

Hi Peter,

I've just started hacking on "Common Lisp GNU Scientific Library", and it will probably be 6 months or so before its in a useful state.

I'll send you a note when I think it might be worth looking at more closely.

Edgar.

Anonymous said...

I'd have to agree with the anonymous user... I'd like to see cl-prevalence and elephant as well. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

One vote for UnCommonWeb (which I thought was already in Debian, but it is not!).

C.E.

Anonymous said...

yes, I'm definitely interested in uncommon web, elephant, and cl-prevalence. The others sound interesting but I personally wouldn't have any immediate use for them...

Many thanks for taking over maintenance for the Debian Lisp packages!

Anonymous said...

Even though the author says cl-gsl is not yet in a useful state, I'm interested in this. I've been using GSL in CL one piece at a time, and I think it would be nice to have a uniform interface. Anyway I intend to take a look at what he has and see how useable it is.

Liam

Anonymous said...

I would find use for cl-gsl also, and perhaps some time to help get it in shape it the project was available...

Anonymous said...

uncommon-web would be nice.

Anonymous said...

A vote for UnCommonWeb and one for Elephant. And thanks !

Anonymous said...

Peter, I'm flattered, but packaging Erlisp would really be premature. ;)

Anonymous said...

Very interested in cl-gsl.

Anonymous said...

One more vote for UnCommonWeb!